Showing posts with label 10-16 February. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 10-16 February. Show all posts

Saturday, 24 February 2007

Penblunt & Hogwash

Snakepit and the charmer

PENBLUNT

It was a Wow! Week for the electronic media: so much to show from just one incident, so much to scream at Pakistan, so much controversy at so little cost (not to human lives… for if humans do not kill humans, what will the TV live on); rather, I am referring to the fact that all the action was located either in Delhi or in nearby Panipat… less transportation cost, fewer reporters covering the entire gamut of “issues”, one OB van to suffice….

And then, of course, as the bilateral trauma seemed to be getting exhausted, with all the juice in the lime squeezed out, there came the stunning and stunningly vulgar “Israel mein saanp se maalish! Porn on mainstream.

Whoever it is, Paki or Hindu bigots, who did the Samjhauta Express thing must have been God to the media.

The channels had gone dry… not a single person committed suicide with advance notice to the media, which could hang out with the cameras hoping the man would jump… and cop it.

Sense prevailed in the turban and Dr Singh did not sing the Sonia song and Mulayam was not sacked.

There was no women’s tennis worth the greedy eyeballs (Justice Hidayatullah had used the term “prurient” in dismissing the obscenity charges against the Bengali novel “Bibar”).

What the F, man!

Then came the great news… SOS has been heard… two compartments of the train had been bombed and the train (as shown in TV graphics, repeatedly, monotonously repeatedly) was travelling like the old Bollywood hit, the “Burning Train”, with no Dharmendra to save the guys.

Just imagine… midnight adrenalin rush, and then, because no sane person would have seen it when the cameras started rolling, the next day all day it remained Breaking News on all the channels.

Then came the Pakistani Foreign minister and there broke out the issue of a joint investigation. And a famous TV channel-head did an exclusive in which one brilliant question asked to the minister was, did he think Pakistan has not done enough to stop terrorism?

Genius

Of course, the question was asked thrice; the first time (original query); then, in the guise of evasion (“But Minister, you have not answered my original question… do you think Pakistan has not done enough…) and finally, the third time after some other questions were answered… the typical sleuth’s cross-questioning, repeating the question once it had been forgotten… just a trap for the guy to make a mistake.

We expected, of course, that the honourable Pakistani minister would throw up his lucrative job and say, “Of course we have not done nothing to stop terrorism…. Dawoodd is still the house guest of Prez Musharraf, don’t you know?”

The speculations continued, whether it was a Hindu bigot or an Islamic one from across the border. And speculation is a national habit, a fundamental birth right of TV journos.

India said they had found a link in Pakistan.

Pakistani minister said bilaterals have never been so rosy, which was bad news and never played up in the media… same reason: if an Indo-Pak honeymoon takes off, TV will lose its rooftop and Bollywood its favourite damning theme: ISI, the ultimate evergreenback villain, the mantra for jingle bells in the box office.

Not a single channel took up the issue of how Maoists in Nepal were selling arms cheap to people across the border; none except one English channel and no prizes for guessing.

No channel reported another doddering old parent ousted from the son’s marital household.

No feature on farmers committing suicide in West Bengal. No report on the river Pagla veering off into Bangladesh and threatening the Calcutta Port with clear extinction

But why do you need all that when there is “Israel mein saanp se maalish”?

It was a coldish midweek day and the sun was in mourning – upset that the clouds were not letting it shine in the era of global warming.

I reached the Press Club and sat down with vodka, trying to warm up a bit. I could have spared the pocket. Hot stuff had been cooked already.

Across me at the far end of the main hall, on the giant TV screen I saw something that I could not believe… a snake slithering over the chest, alabaster breasts (in black brassier), belly button, navel of a sexy woman.

“Israel mein saanp se maalish”, read the caption and the news reader went on how this unique massage was being given in Israel.

For a split second I was jealous of the snakes. Then the camera shifted to the woman’s white legs (black undergarment), and snake slid down the legs, down on the thigh, down, down….

Eeks!

And like the graphics of the Burning Train, just those vulgar shots were repeated thrice in a news item of one minute…. And the news was being shown since morning, because a housewife I spoke to said, “Oh, I have seen it.”

Wake up, Mr Dasmunshi, this is not just a foreign entertainment channel, this is real desi stuff, Minister!

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, 13 February 2007

Penblunt & Hogwash

Breaking News: Indian TV news is rotting

Sujit Chakraborty

This is a column being written under the totalitarian regime and command of Pinaki Bhattacharya, and had we not been friends for so long, I’d have approached Amnesty, for he is forcing me to write on a subject to which I am a novice: media journalism.

But then, as a TV watcher, I have been a veteran just as anyone of you out there.
There is one question that has been plaguing me ever since choice became available vide cable TV, when the moronic government channel could be switched off and something as exciting as BBC could be watched (I am an unabashed BBC fanatic).

So, you watch BBC, then you watch History Channel, and NatGeo, and sports, serials, sex, fashion, films… and you are having an unending infotainment orgasm when it suddenly all goes limp!

There comes Hindi news channels… the Indians are here… move over firangis… no more cultural imperialism.
God said, let there be Hindi news channels, and there was Aajtak… initially brilliant but slowly meandered to repetitiveness. But it made a killing in advertisement revenue, and got many rivals green with envy
So, there came other Hindi channels as well and the TRP war exploded.
And with competition came not quality but trash, reversal of global trends.
“Sansaneeeeee”, one news-feature programme went, and the presenter with a balding forehead and a pony tail, growled, grimaced and declared that he would reveal all and he growled and made nasty faces over stories that were so insignificant, one wondered what he was getting at, after all.
Sansanee, Hindi for sensationalism, gripped the Hindi news channels, the need to shock, the need to take away the context.

Imagine this:
The head, the owner so to say, of a Hindi news channel kept showing a severed leg lying in a street in Bombay, and uttering in moronic monotone: “This is a severed leg lying in Bombay, which our viewer so-and-so had sent a video clipping of. If any one can identify whose leg this is and whether the man is alive or dead….”
The channel called this… yes, you are right, Breaking News.

This was followed by another news item where the camera just hung on from below a building where a jobless young man was sitting on the terrace threatening to kill himself. The cameras hung on, waiting for the man to jump, and showed everything, all the way till the jobless, hapless man hit the ground and spilt his life out….
Breaking News, of course, though it was being shown on all the other channels as well and till the last time they showed the coverage, it was Breaking News!

Sorry, I am wrong, because towards the end of that night, ‘expert commentators’ for the channel reasoned that the suicidal man would not have died, after all, and at worst broken his leg – had he jumped in the right manner ‑ from a three-storied building…. But then, the idiot landed on his head, not legs, so he died!
I wonder why this is breaking news. I wonder why this cameraman was sitting idle. He is a journalist, so he had to cover, not protect and guide a life to safety, because then there would be no story.

But this is veering away from what I had wanted to write, which is that don’t our TV editors watch the foreign news channels? The entire concept of news coverage is different. For instance, Nisha Pillai is a news reader, as we understand this. But here we just have news readers. Salma Sultan of yore never got down to reporting. Nisha does. So do many others, and sometimes the more famous of BBC’s reporters actually read news.
And if there is a personality to be interviewed on TV on, say environmental issue, it will be Nisha, because she has covered the green beat, but if it is on fashion, it will not be Nisha, but someone who knows the fabrics and designs.

In Indian channels, interviewing somehow gives the interviewer a star status, so only some are allowed to do that, whether they know the subject or not… the haloed editors.
Tim Sebastian did interviews BBC, practically one a day. But his demeanour is different in each case, his attitude changes, and even the settings in the place where the shoot takes place changes.
Why can’t we do things like that?

We do not think, may be, or may be the answer is in something else? May be we have fossilised, or decided not to grow up… may be we have decided that we are so good that we need not change.
And do remember, it is not that we do not have technicians or investigators or designers here who are up to the mark; in fact, we export them, we are so full of them.
Look at the Indian advertisements. I do not know how much of this is copy from Western ideas. I doubt. We create some of the most superb ads…
So why are we so stupid on news, so crude and so unwanting to excel and reluctant? Why do we chase only sensationalism?
All of you have some answers, so do fill us in
I have some of the answers, but I am not breaking that news just now.
Here’s wishing you all the boredom!

Sphere: Related Content